8 Comments
Sep 20, 2023Liked by DeeceX

Et tu, Wall Street Journal? 🤣

Expand full comment

When I read my fellow Democrats complaining about Patrick’s political chicanery, I am reminded of Captain Reynard protesting that he was “shocked, shocked to find out gambling was happening in the bar.” Has Patrick ever varied from his “win at any cost “ way of conducting the business of the Senate? No, and he will not. As to the burden of proof, the senate’s verdict would have been the same under the beyond a reasonable doubt standard as it would under a mere scintilla of evidence burden. While I thought Patrick’s harangue about the House ‘s performance was unnecessary, I think now and said so at the time, that John Smithee’s speech was right on point. The House seemed much more interested in speed than due process or accuracy. The whole impeachment enterprise was based on political divisions within the Republican Party. Unfortunately, for Texas, the A.G.’s actions certainly met the level of conviction.

Finally, I am in complete agreement with you regarding the loss of the public integrity unit. The reason why is best illustrated by the Paxton’s securities indictment s. The Republicans were so fixated on Ronnie Earle and liberal Travis County, they line item vetoed the PIU’ s appropriation and created a non Workable plan.

Expand full comment
Sep 20, 2023Liked by DeeceX

Thank you. I will never get bored of the subject until we see some corrective action. Keep on top of the process.

Expand full comment
founding

With just a bit of editing, Patrick's rant could describe the evidence-free push for impeachment in the U.S. House.

Expand full comment

This is a little late but did Paxton bleach his hair for the Tucker Carlson interview? Sure looked like it on the clip I saw.

Expand full comment